| The
National Federation of the Blind of Connecticut |
| Disabled Employees Sue Rehab Administration for Discriminatory Job Termination |
|
For Immediate Release A group of disabled and older
Rehabilitation Services Administration employees sued Department of Education
Secretary Margaret Spellings on Sept. 20, 2005 in federal court in Washington,
D.C., asking the court to keep her from firing them when the new fiscal
year begins on Oct. 1. RSA distributes federal grant monies to state and
local organizations to provide job and independent living skills training
to severely handicapped adults. The employees work in regional
offices around the country, where they help grant recipients comply with
the law and help them run the programs more effectively. RSA's programs
assist millions of disabled people in communities across the nation, and
its employees provide a valuable knowledge base and institutional continuity
for State VR agencies, which are often underfunded and have high staff
turnover. In February 2005, the agency
announced it would close the regional offices and terminate all the employees,
including the 24 plaintiffs, seventeen of whom are disabled and five of
whom are blind. Only the 65 RSA regional employees, within the 4,500-employee
Department of Education, were targeted for downsizing. According to former
RSA Commissioner Dr. Joanne Wilson, who is blind, a Department of Education
official told her that RSA has "too many blind employees." Dr.
Wilson resigned from the agency in protest of the closing of the regional
offices. In recent years the RSA parent organization, the Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services, routinely made illegal inquiries
about job applicants' disabilities before approving their hiring. The hiring of qualified blind
job applicants has been either delayed or rejected on at least three occasions
in the last two years. RSA contends that closing the
regional offices will cut costs, and headquarters employees will take
over the work that was done in the regions. George Chuzi, who is representing
the group, says, "RSA apparently plans to help the local VR organizations
by remote control." He is with Washington, D.C. law firm Kalijarvi,
Chuzi and Newman, where associate Heather White also represents the plaintiffs. The law suit notes that both
Houses of Congress approved RSA's budget and appropriated more than was
requested for some programs. The group questions why the Department of
Education did not ask for enough money to pay the salaries of all of its
employees. "They are motivated by equal parts dislike of people with
disabilities and dislike of federal assistance to people with disabilities,"
says Wilson. The law suit alleges that the
decisions to close the regional offices and terminate the employees was
motivated by the agency's culture of discrimination against people with
disabilities, especially the blind. They also point to the agency's failure
to offer to transfer them to headquarters in violation of the law on "transfers
of function," which allows federal employees to move with their jobs
when the functions they perform are moved from one competitive area to
another. The agency claims that this
action is not a transfer of function, while simultaneously insisting that
all functions that were previously performed in the regional offices will
now be performed from headquarters. The duties performed in the regions
will go on, but without the regional employees and their expertise. According to the law suit,
however, headquarters employees are unfamiliar with the duties of the
regional employees, making even "remote control" impossible.
The group is seeking a temporary
restraining order preventing RSA from firing the regional employees, who
allege that with the high cost of health insurance and their preexisting
conditions, once they are fired they will not be able to afford health
care for themselves and their families. The National Federation of
the Blind has filed a related lawsuit on behalf of blind vendors who will
be affected by the RSA's closing of regional offices. Both cases are now
before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. |
| Return to The National Federation of the Blind of Connecticut Home Page |
|
|
|
For more information, E-mail us at: info@nfbct.org |
|
|
| The National
Federation of the Blind of Connecticut 477 Connecticut Boulevard, Suite 217 East Hartford, CT 06108 (860) 289-1971 |
|
|
| Updated May 2, 2006 |